Skip Nav

Bayaning 3rd World Essay

Warrantless Search

❶The documentary-style opening then shifts to a conversation between the two directors of how they are going to approach the plot of their said film after much research on Rizal and other historical events and people revolving around the national hero.

How to cite this page




As if like a thought in both the filmmakers, they heard Trining and Narcisa checking out the lamp that Rizal has left for Trining where in the lid of the lamp contained the last poem of Jose Rizal, Mi Ultimo Adios. Because of all the seemingly unanswerable questions, there conversation with Rizal Joel Torre , who they perceive to be fond of only riddle some answers and who smokes like them, was anything but meaningful. In fact, it was more a release of emotion for the filmmakers than an investigation.

The Jose Rizal the filmmakers have perceived was more like them, angry, confused, and a smoker. The first filmmaker reasoned that there were truly many kinds of Rizal that we could perceive and that his life only belongs in a book. The filmmakers Ricky Davao and Cris Villanueva in the film lead following facts that: Before they do that, they try to investigate on the heroism of the Philippine national hero.

Of particular focus is his supposed retraction of his views against the Roman Catholic Church during the Spanish regime in the Philippines which he expressed primarily through his two novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo.

The one who is being accused in the film was Jose Rizal and Josephine Bracken because of their undeniable words. The film expressed the most vulnerable sides of Rizal and the people revolving around him. Though the film was shot in black and white and on a seemingly old film, the emotion from the characters the much life and drama in overlapping the lack of color. Nevertheless, the film tends to give a certain mystery in every viewer that we need to solve in order to satisfy ourselves, unlike the filmmakers.

He can be an indomitable rationalist or an unmistakable deist. The film has successfully given a variety of images of Rizal to viewers as guide to their own personal truth in who Rizal really is to them. The movie presented some interesting arguments in which when reflected upon will surely create doubts about him. Does he really deserve to be named our national hero? What happened if he did not die? Did Jose Rizal retracted? With regards the retraction of Jose Rizal it was clear from the evidence that he wrote a statement changing his position about the church.

Or was the statement authentic? That is another question. No problem with that, what stimulated the conflict is whether the document was really signed by the national hero or was just forged by the priests, if in such case the latter is true the priests lied thus, he committed a sin. In that matter aggravating the abuses they have ensued to the Filipinos.

I personally believe that, wherever our national hero retracted his membership with the Masonry and embraced back the Roman Catholic Church that does not change anything about his goal of liberating the country. It did not affect his nationalist ideals, it did not deter him from continuing to write about the abuses of the Spaniards, and above all it did not stop him from offering his life to the Philippines.

If ever true, his retraction was motivated by his personal reasons of marrying the person he loves— that did not completely changed anything about him, why not give him a chance to pursue some interests and desires for himself. To end, even if Jose Rizal has been found to retract from his religious beliefs but not still proven true a number of materials prove that he did not retract from his nationalist and patriotic goals.

He did not change his strong opposition stance overnight but instead continued to express his desires through subtle writings with a humungous impact to the readers which until now resonates in our society— the overarching influence of his works and life.

Not all persons are perfect, Jose Rizal is one. His life is also full of mysteries needing explanations but that mysteries cannot be answered now because the enigma has been cemented by his departure from earth. What we all have left to do is to build on what our history books say about him and embark on a quest to believe in the same goals he had leaving the doubts aside, for what is important is his contribution to this country and not about his personal life.

Generally, this film is educational and can be viewed by all. It has been established that Jose Rizal retracted his membership from the Masonry and gave back his allegiance to the Roman Catholic Church in order for him to marry Josephine Bracken. Josephine Bracken who was not able to get the trust of the hero's immediate family was put to blame as the primary cause of Rizal's repudiation which came out in the December Manifesto. His mother astutely denied such claims pointing out that his son did not betray his country, did not swerve in the event, and was staunch in his stance and opposition to the colonizers.

Together with Trining, Rizal's older sister they suspected Miss Josephine Bracken as a traitor and a spy commissioned by the Spaniards to hasten the trial and conviction of our national hero. The movie presented some interesting arguments in which when reflected upon will surely create doubts about him. Does he really deserve to be named our national hero? What happened if he did not die?

Did Jose Rizal retracted? With regards the retraction of Jose Rizal it was clear from the evidence that he wrote a statement changing his position about the church. Or was the statement authentic?

That is another question. No problem with that, what stimulated the conflict is whether the document was really signed by the national hero or was just forged by the priests, if in such case the latter is true the priests lied thus, he committed a sin.

In that matter aggravating the abuses they have ensued to the Filipinos. I personally believe that, wherever our national hero retracted his membership with the Masonry and embraced back the Roman Catholic Church, that does not change anything about his goal of liberating the country. It did not affect his nationalist ideals, it did not deter him from continuing to write about the abuses of the Spaniards, and above all it did not stop him from offering his life to the Philippines.

If ever true, his retraction was motivated by his personal reasons of marrying the person he loves-- that did not completely changed anything about him, why not give him a chance to pursue some interests and desires for himself. I have searched for books about Jose Rizal's retraction and found an article authored by Gagelonia vehemently saying that Jose Rizal did not retract as evidenced by his letters to some of his close friends. Rizal mentioned in one of his letters to Ferdinand Blumentritt that he has no desire to take part in conspiracies, i.

Implying that as long as peaceful means can be sought he would resort to that option. The strong nationalist and patriotic character of Dr.

Jose Rizal sets him apart from others. He was firm and bold in his opposition to the colonizers that is why it is hard to just believe that he retracted from his nationalist goals in just a blink of an eye.

When he published his famous books-- Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo, Jose Rizal became a threat to the colonizers and the existing government in the Philippines.


Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Bayaning 3rd World Reaction Paper - Free download as Word Doc .doc /.docx), PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online for free. Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site.

Privacy FAQs

REACTION PAPER: BAYANING THIRD WORLD Though the movie has a lot to point out about our nationalhero, there about three main points on which the a 5/5(1).

About Our Ads

Free Essays on Ang Bayaning 3Rd World Summary And Reaction Paper for students. Use our papers to help you with yours 1 - Bayaning 3rd World (Reaction Paper) Bayaning 3rd world is a complex film done through the form of investigative journalism wherein it attempts to explore the myth around our national hero Jose Rizal.

Cookie Info

Jan 18,  · Bayaning Third World: A Reaction Paper by Russel S. Pernites “A man may die but his ideas and thoughts forever live and remain indelible imprints of time”. Bayaning Third World . Bayaning 3rd World: A Reaction Paper Pages: 1 ( words) Published: August 13, Higit na nabago ng pelikulang Bayaning 3rd world ang aking pananaw .